Friday, December 4, 2009
Market Timing - When Markets Chop
That's an aphorsim I came up with after watching profits I had earned in previously strong markets, frustratingly frittered away once markets began and continued to pull back or move sideways afterwards.
I've seen this scenario play out with most traders and investors, over and over again. The reason it's so common, is because markets almost ALWAYS go through a period of retreat or chop AFTER a strong trend.
Since March 2009 for example, though the bigger trend has been bullishly strong, markets have pulled back every 17-20 days like clockwork. On the Dow, each"counter-trend" retreat has represented declines somewhere between 200-500 points, or a 2-5% giveback (with the Dow at 10K).
(You can learn more about that 20 day cycle here: Market Timing )
The important thing traders should understand, is that same cycle also advances half the time.
If for that reason, traders will buy (I buy double beta ETF's like the DDM, QLD, and SSO) at the 20 day cyclical low (which often occurs near the 30 or 50 day moving average, and then mechanically take profits (or some profits) off the table at the 20 day cyclical high, which occurs some 10-12 day later, they won't have to live through the drawdowns and frustration that come with 10 days of decline that will inevitably follow.
This of course is a very simple, straight forward strategy anyone can follow, remembering that rarely, if ever, do we short the 20 day cycle in a bull market. But once our longer term trend (also another cycle we follow) begins to decline, we'll reverse that strategy, and start making money in a bear market too.
Friday, November 20, 2009
Stock Market Today
The important thing to keep an eye on, is whether the decline periods continue to form that confirming bullish pattern of "higher lows" on the indices price charts. As long as that happens, it's an indication that the longer term trend remains intact.
In 2003, that intermediate cycle bullish trend didn't end -www.themarketforecast.com/HowItWorks.html - for nearly a year after the long term and intermediate cycles formed a cluster in March 2003. We could easily a continuation of this longer term bullish trend last just as long.
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Successful Trading In the Stock Market - One Thing
Those who stick around and take some time to learn, generally get it and do very well, what's puzzling however, are those who stay stuck, and would rather just keep watching.
It seems to me that they are also people who have learned to be “afraid” of taking action in other areas of life too. I can tell by their emails and excuses. Perhaps that's due to unreasonable expectations, or fear from costly past mistakes.
Consequently, they wait, and wait, and wait. They wait until the one time they feel it's perfectly safe to get in.
Unfortunately, that secure “feeling” couldn’t be more wrong. Their waiting has brought them to the precise time when smart money has begun selling their profitable positions to all late comers.
Rather than take responsibilty and USE methods that could really help them take powerful control of their future, many instead will ask if I would just go ahead and handle their money for them. No wonder fund managers make millions.
The amazing thing here too, is that fund managers tell me, as long as they don’t LOSE too much of the clients money, their clients will stay put, year after year, all the while managers keep making their 1-3% on accounts that aren't even growing. It’s crazy.
But it does point out pretty clearly to me, that desire isn’t enough. Learning isn’t enough. Believing in the outcome isn’t enough. Being prodded isn’t enough…
I think successful investing/trading boils down to this one thing: You've got to do “it” as if you had no choice. Do it for real, or die, perhaps.
Maybe like a new skydiver, who was just nudged out of a plane…
Pulling the ripchord to the chute isn’t an option, or something to “think about”, or to learn to do anymore. You just do it. If all goes well, it’s going to be a lot easier next time…
Trading Online
Thursday, October 29, 2009
If you bought the QLD or DDM at yesterday's close, or early in the session today, you've got some nice profits to lock in with stop loss protection. Consider using the Donchian channel center line on a 30 minute chart as a first tier stop (39.52), and the bottom of the channel as a second level stop (39.10).
If you haven't subscribed to our service yet, get a 30 day free trial and learn to how to trade the stock market with daily forecasts and trading advice from it's author - Stephen Swanson.
Visit us at: www.themarketforecast.com and www.themarketforecast.com/Video1.html for an introductory video on some very cool stock trading techniques.
History Remembered
Financial Historian on ‘29: ‘Great Crash’ Vs. ‘Break in the Market’
From The Wall Street Journal's MarketBeat, October 28, 2009
By Matt Phillips
[This week] marks 80 years since the best known part of the 1929 stock market collapse, a two-day rout on Oct. 28 and Oct. 29 of that year. The equities crash brought a painful close to the period of unbridled financial optimism that was the 1920s.
To mark the occasion, MarketBeat has been asking financial historians for their thoughts — mini-essays if you will — on how the Great Crash informs the way we think about the current market recovery. Today’s offering comes from Richard Sylla, Henry Kaufman Professor of the History of Financial Institutions and Markets at New York University:
Because their teachers and their history books said so, most people know that the Great Crash of 1929 caused the Great Depression of the early 1930s. I am not one of these people.
What I know is that the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 306 the day before Black Thursday, October 24, 1929, and at 199 on November 13, three weeks later. That drop of 35 percent was the Great Crash. I also know that on April 17, 1930, the day before Good Friday, the Dow closed at 294, or 96 percent of its level before Black Thursday. In other words, almost all of the decline of the crash proper had been undone by a recovery of 48 percent in the Dow between Halloween ‘29 and Easter ‘30. Most people don’t know that, or if they ever did they forgot it.
On Good Friday ‘30, the New York Times referred not to the Great Crash, but to “the break in the market last Fall.” The Times that day also noted that the day before, April 17, “average prices worked higher and a few outstanding issues shot up smartly to new high prices for the year to date,” and that “British interests were investing heavily in these issues.”
The Great Depression began sometime after the spring of 1930, most likely when a lot of banks failed late that year. But the so-called Great Crash a year earlier had almost nothing to do with those bank failures, the first of thousands of bank failures that occurred from late 1930 to March 1933.
What’s interesting from the perspective of 2009 is that from September 12, 2008, the Friday before Lehman, to the low of March 9, 2009, the Dow lost 44 percent. The Great Crash of 2008-09 was actually a greater crash than the Great Crash of 1929. And half a year after the crash lows of last March, the Dow again is up about 50 percent, as it was half a year after October 1929.
Is the market’s recovery since March now giving us a better forecast of what lies ahead than it did in April 1930? Let’s hope so. Let’s hope, too, that people stop exaggerating the effects of “the break in the market” in October ‘29.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Indices rose on the day with momentum and short term cycles that expectedly began turning up. They ended the day right at their resistive 30 day averages (for the Dow it was also its 5 DMA), but based on the lack of selling into the close, we are likely to see some follow through with that line of resistance surpassed today.
That would correlate with the still rising shorter term cycles. Both the 6.5 and 10 day are starting to rise on our Filtered charts, and our regular Forecast charts both show they are in their advancing phase.
From here, it becomes important to see whether the move is going to be joined by a rising intermediate cycle, or whether we'll have a few days where the intermediate cycle simply moves sideways.
If so, that could be a signal of a further intermediate drop, similar to what we had after the 6/25 - 7/1 sideways move. Then, indices found support at their 50 day moving averages but never gained enough strength to vault above their 30 DMA on a closing basis.
Since so many technicians watch that 30 DMA, it's critical that it be reclaimed quickly or traders tend to start selling into the stalled action.
I am still long on this short term up trend.
I have a first level stop on the DDM at the center line of the Donchian channel on a 30 minute chart, and at the center channel line on the 60 minute chart. Should we see some extended upside on the short term today, where the 5 DMA is exceeded and starts to rise, I will begin to watch that as a third level for my stops.
In essence, whichever of those lines is highest is my first stop level, and whichever is lowest is my last.
As you can see, short term (yellow) and momentum (cyan) lines are pointing up today. Play it long with stops as described.
Friday, October 2, 2009
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Morning Webinar
Recognition goes to Dick in this afternoon's advanced training webinar--great trade today!
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Avoid Overtrading
Here are the 4 trades from this morning's session in the S&P 500 e-minis.
Net Profit | |||||
# | Type | Date/Time | Symbol | Price | Cum Net Prof |
1 | Buy | 8/11/2009 8:33 | ESU09 | $1,000.75 | $101.00 |
Sell | 8/11/2009 8:35 | ESU09 | $1,001.00 | ||
2 | Sell | 8/11/2009 8:38 | ESU09 | $1,000.50 | $476.00 |
Buy | 8/11/2009 8:40 | ESU09 | $999.50 | ||
3 | Sell | 8/11/2009 8:44 | ESU09 | $998.75 | $851.00 |
Buy | 8/11/2009 8:48 | ESU09 | $997.00 | ||
4 | Sell | 8/11/2009 9:00 | ESU09 | $996.25 | $351.00 |
Buy | 8/11/2009 9:01 | ESU09 | $995.50 | ||
$1,779.00 |
Were there more trades I could have taken? Probably one or two; but it's much more enjoyable and profitable to be patient, wait out the midday chop, then take a look at what may be setting up in the afternoon session.
After the market close:
I didn't take any other trades today. Steve and I spent some time discussing the webinars and video we are putting together, then I got busy shooting a couple of new airsoft guns with my 11-year-old son and just didn't spend much time watching the market. (By the way, having a friendly impromptu airsoft battle with a bunch of the neighborhood kids is a great way to have fun and bond with your own kids.)
There were a couple of trades I might have taken, but I missed them entirely or took a look at the market after the move was well underway. I refused to chase profits; I've done that one too many times before.
I'd rather walk away with my gains and wait until the session tomorrow morning, so I traded a total of only 35 minutes this morning, then spent a few minutes glancing at the market this afternoon. About 3-1/2 to 4 points in less than an hour of trading today--I really enjoy using Steve's methods.
I will not be posting my trades every day. I don't day trade every day. But I promise that when I do choose to post them, I will post the good, the bad and the ugly--winners and losers. No holding back, because the point is to help everyone learn something from the experience.
The lessons from yesterday and today?
1. Steer clear of midday choppiness.
2. Avoid overtrading.
3. Be patient.
4. Have fun!
Monday, August 10, 2009
Today's Trades
I made it up in the afternoon to end the day up more than 6 points net of commissions. This is a report you can generate in TradeStation. If you want assistance finding and generating it, send Steve the request via email and he will cover it in the next webinar.
Net Profit & | |||||
# | Type | Date/Time | Symbol | Price | Cum Net Prof |
1 | Sell | 8/10/2009 8:47 | ESU09 | $1,004.75 | $726.00 |
Buy | 8/10/2009 8:48 | ESU09 | $1,003.25 | ||
2 | Buy | 8/10/2009 8:52 | ESU09 | $1,004.75 | $351.00 |
Sell | 8/10/2009 8:56 | ESU09 | $1,005.50 | ||
3 | Sell | 8/10/2009 9:00 | ESU09 | $1,004.50 | $226.00 |
Buy | 8/10/2009 9:00 | ESU09 | $1,004.00 | ||
4 | Buy | 8/10/2009 9:22 | ESU09 | $1,004.75 | $226.00 |
Sell | 8/10/2009 9:25 | ESU09 | $1,005.25 | ||
5 | Sell | 8/10/2009 9:33 | ESU09 | $1,006.25 | $101.00 |
Buy | 8/10/2009 9:37 | ESU09 | $1,006.00 | ||
6 | Sell | 8/10/2009 9:56 | ESU09 | $1,005.75 | ($774.00) |
Buy | 8/10/2009 10:04 | ESU09 | $1,007.25 | ||
7 | Buy | 8/10/2009 10:04 | ESU09 | $1,007.25 | ($774.00) |
Sell | 8/10/2009 10:18 | ESU09 | $1,005.75 | ||
8 | Sell | 8/10/2009 10:18 | ESU09 | $1,005.75 | $1,226.00 |
Buy | 8/10/2009 11:30 | ESU09 | $1,003.25 | ||
9 | Sell | 8/10/2009 12:56 | ESU09 | $1,001.50 | $1,101.00 |
Buy | 8/10/2009 13:22 | ESU09 | $999.25 | ||
10 | Buy | 8/10/2009 13:56 | ESU09 | $1,001.50 | $726.00 |
Sell | 8/10/2009 14:03 | ESU09 | $1,003.00 | ||
$3,135.00 |
Monday, July 27, 2009
Use the 5-day Moving Average on your daily charts for clear exit signals. Set your stops below the 5-day MA.
Use the 8/8 crossover on daily and intraday charts to do the same thing.
Use stop-loss orders; stopping out is your pay day. The 5-period Moving Average is valid for all time frames, but for more flexibility on intraday charts use the Donchian channel to avoid getting stopped out too quickly.
Use stop-losses instead of taking profits quickly. Ride the bull as long as you can, because he will try to buck you off. The market maker is doing that: he'll take the price back down to stop you out before he takes the price up.
In addition to intraday trades for short-term profits, be sure to trade the intermediate chart. This will prevent you from missing nice trending trades, even when you can't sit and watch the market intraday.
Keep in mind that our double-beta ETFs are leveraged plays, up and down. Leverage is great when it's going your way, but set your stops and get out when reversals come.
Your position size should never put you in a situation to lose more than 1% of your portfolio. Plan your trade size and stop-loss orders accordingly.
Use an intraday chart even if you can’t get real-time data--the 8/8 crossover will give you nice signals on getting back into a trend.
Thursday, July 23, 2009
12th Straight Day
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
EBRI's Annual Retirement Confidence Survey
According to the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI):
"Workers who say they are very confident about having enough money for a comfortable retirement this year hit the lowest level in 2009 (13 percent) since the Retirement Confidence Survey started asking the question in 1993, continuing a two-year decline. Retirees also posted a new low in confidence about having a financially secure retirement, with only 20 percent now saying they are very confident (down from 41 percent in 2007)."
EBRI also says less than half of those surveyed have any idea how much money they will need to retire comfortably:
"Many workers still do not have a good idea of how much they need to save for retirement. Only 44 percent of workers report they and/or their spouse have tried to calculate how much money they will need to have saved by the time they retire—and an equal proportion (44 percent) simply guess at how much they will need for a comfortable retirement."
Unfortunately, an astounding 53% have less than $25,000 in savings and investment. Fully 76% of those responding to the survey reported having less than $100,000 put away for retirement. So, regardless of how much they think they need, few respondents have much at all put aside for retirement.
There has never been a more urgent need for successful investing to rebuild the account values ravaged by last year's market decline.
Read the entire report at
http://www.ebri.org/pdf/briefspdf/EBRI_IB_4-2009_RCS1.pdf
Trade the Trend
The question all investors need to answer for themselves is this: Which trend do I want to follow? Short-, intermediate- or long-term trend?
Steve showed us how to use the 5-day moving average and the price channel as stops in the current intermediate trend, and how the 5-day gives us a great exit point during the initial phase of this intermediate advance. The price channel will give us more lattitude when the short-term cycle chop begins.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
DDM and QLD Continue to Move Up, Are You? Paper Trade to Gain Confidence.
Monday, July 20, 2009
Are You Conventional?
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
What are We Seeing in the Markets?
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
The Problem Most Investors Face Using History to Predict the Stock Market
"Still, brokers and financial planners keep reminding us, there's almost never been a 30-year period since 1802 when stocks have underperformed bonds.
"These true believers rely on the gospel of 'Stocks for the Long Run', the book by finance professor Jeremy Siegel of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania that was first published in 1994.
"Using data assembled by other scholars, Prof. Siegel extended the history of U.S. stock returns all the way back to 1802. He came to two conclusions that became articles of faith to millions of investors: Ever since Thomas Jefferson was in the White House, stocks have generated a 'remarkably constant' average return of nearly 7% a year after inflation. (Adding inflation at 3% yields the commonly cited 10% annual stock return.) And, declared Prof. Siegel, 'the risks of holding stocks decrease over time'."
"There is just one problem with tracing stock performance all the way back to 1802: It isn't really valid...The 1802-to-1870 stock indexes are rotten with methodological flaws.
"Another emperor of the late bull market, it seems, has turned out to have no clothes."
Monday, July 6, 2009
Only 25%?
"In fact, researchers at the investment management firm Dimensional Fund Advisors found that from 1980 to 2008, the top-performing 25% of stocks were responsible for all the gains in the broad market, as represented by the University of Chicago's CRSP total equity market database (see the chart).
"As for the bottom 75% of stocks in the U.S. market, they collectively generated annual losses of around 2% over the past 29 years."
Read the entire article here:
http://money.cnn.com/2009/05/09/magazines/moneymag/stock-strategies.moneymag/index.htm
A Quick Summary of the Year to Date
From Steve's Commentary for July 6 at The Market Forecast:
"[W]e had two incredibly sloped intermediate moves during our first six months of trading this year. If you followed only the intermediate cycle and just played it twice, using the DXD in the January-February decline, you gained about 46%. Since the March 6th lows, the DDM rose to a high with gains of 70%. That's a whopping 116% so far this year. If you add to that the ability to trade many of the shorter term swings in between those moves, the returns go much higher.
"But don't worry if all the news kept you out too long, or you struggled with taking profits too early, or you are just learning how to play both sides of the market. The important thing for everyone here, is that you didn't get slaughtered by the bear side of the markets as did just about everyone else. You've managed to be profitable during an historic time when most investors were left holding the bag at the top, and who are still down some 40% from where they were in October 2007 (even after the recent recovery rally).
"Best of all, there is plenty of big swing action remaining and our cycle work should keep us on the right side so we can do it all again!"
Exactly what is Steve talking about?
First, our cycle charts tell us what is coming next. They are great for predicting the market.
Second, we use simple technical indicators to confirm market moves. We'll include a 5, 30 and 50 day moving average to define key support and resistance levels. Throw in Steve's favorite short-term crossover, along with a couple of tools he has refined, for intraday trading confirmations.
And third, we use Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) to take advantage of moves up and down. Why ETFs? To keep it simple.
Many investors are spending valuable time trying to identify good stocks that will outperform the market. It's time-consuming work.
The fact is, research shows that only 25% of stocks beat the market on average. Even fewer are real "home runs". And a full 75% of stocks fail to keep up with the market. We don't like those odds.
Think about those facts. If a rising market lifts good stocks and the poor ones fail to keep pace, why waste time looking for the home run stocks? Simply trade the market that lifts those stocks!
If you want to outperform a bullish move, trade the "double-beta" ETF tied to that index. Double-beta shares are designed to move up twice as fast as the underlying index. Is the market turning, heading down? Trade the double-beta ETF intended to move up twice as fast as its underlying index is falling.
We'd rather identify market direction, correctly forecast reversals and re-entry points for profitable trades, and then trade the entire index with the corresponding ETF.
We recommend the DDM, QLD, SSO, FAS for bullish markets moving up. The first three are double-beta shares tied to the Dow, the NASDAQ, and the S&P 500, respectively. As for the FAS, that one is a triple-beta ETF intended to move up three times as fast as the Russell 1000 Financial Index.
We recommend the DXD, QID, SDS, FAZ for bearish markets moving down. Like their counterparts above, the first three are double-beta shares tied to the Dow, the NASDAQ, and the S&P 500, respectively. The key difference is that they are designed to move up when the underlying index moves down. The FAZ is a triple-beta ETF intended to move up three times as fast as the Russell 1000 Financial Index is moving down.
Caution: These ETFs are not "buy-and-hold" ETFs. They are intended for trading. Learn to do it right and you should see great results.
Remember to paper trade any new strategy or tools to become familiar with them and ensure you are trading profitably.
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Markets Bounce Back in Q2
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
It ran smack into that average in the first hour of trade and reversed downward.
You'll see the break below the 8/8 crossover average on the 15 and 30 minute charts when that happens, and that will be a decent entry into the DXD for an intra-day or longer - inverse Dow play. Today it added nearly a buck within an hour of that event.
Steve
Monday, June 29, 2009
http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/stocks/2009-06-28-buy-and-hold-stock-strategy-investing_N.htm |
Friday, June 19, 2009
An Interesting Take on Investing
"The first element of the strategy is to be forward-looking rather than backward-looking.
'That speaks to asset allocation and geographical exposures,' El-Erian said.
The second element is that the road forward will be mired with sharp turns and bumps. As a result, investors must position their portfolios to benefit from cyclical trends.
'That bumpiness constitutes an additional challenge for buy and holds, which is to make sure that people can in fact hold -- because when you have a very bumpy journey, there is a temptation to stop holding at the wrong time,' he said.
'So there has to be a much more responsive element of the portfolio that is looking to capture not long-term secular and structural trends, but looking to catch shorter-term cyclical and technical trends,' he said.
The third element of El-Erian's plan is conscious risk management, which gets at diversification. In the past, El-Erian said, one of the problems with the buy-and-hold strategy was that it encouraged people to think that diversification was sufficient for risk mitigation.
'That's no longer the case. Diversification is necessary, but it's not sufficient,' he said. It's necessary because it's the best method for mitigation of risk, but it's not sufficient because, as El-Erian points out, you can have years, such as last year, in which all the correlations go against you. Therefore, he said, buy and hold needs to be supplemented with much more responsive risk management.
'It's not enough to say I'm going to be able to buy and hold simply because I'm diversified. One has to go a few steps further and ask what does it look like when I'm actually buying and holding?' he said.
Building on that, El-Erian said a portfolio should be constructed such that only part of it is held for the 'long term,' which he defines 'long term' [sic] as three to five years, max -- because it's difficult to forecast what happens much beyond that."